direct game doesnt work cause it comes off NEEDY to alot of women in USA

so direct game does not work in America

its comes off as needy and desperate...ameerican girls want social savy and also they have secret society womaneese  where they don't want to be seen easy or slutty.

so they protect their ego and self image.

this is also why we must always use plausible deniability.

ALWAYS 

if you don't use plausible deniability , then its better not to verbalize the matrx at all and assume the metaframe as man to woman.


game itself is non verbal direct  using verbal neutrality or bt spiking or even disqualifier or time false constraint.

I think its called microloop theory  mehow mentioned ... but  its also needy to push more and over invest in the girl too much too soon...

like jeffy said once... you do  work so that she responds and you go with her but not too much, you create space and she comes to you....

so direct game is too much too needy and sets a lot of frame of needy clingy guy who wants her.

girls want intrigue....girls want to chase unconsciously in these usa type society...
they chase when you reached comfort and you pull back and fractionate....

they chase hard.  so I know saffron does indirect game for daygame and all...  passive active.
plays on strength and strengthens his weekness with his game and assertiveness.

like mark says make her want it more.

this is the mentality  of a guy you want to have..if you get desperate or clingy... you just pull back on yourself and make yourself logical that you have to control your own urges , save these urges when you are about to have sex with her.

makes sense now.

no direct game... just a direct statement of intent when you reached comfort phase...and have qualified her good enough and have already set your sexual framing.

like mehow says qualification comes from the mindset of abundance.